Archive for the ‘Sue Olsen GAL complaint’ Tag
Hennepin County Injustice Leave a comment
I now have custody 1 comment
This is the official complaint for Sue Olsen here in Minnesota. She spoke to my son 30seconds and said it was the worst case of coaching ever. I found out later that Carol Orleck had spoken to her before court which is against the law 2 comments
Kusek, Laurie Ms. H: Per your request for reconsideration, I did review a transcript of the hearing before Judge Bernhardson on August 16, 2011, which included the comments from the Guardian ad Litem. Based upon that transcript, I believe that the matter w
Ms. H: Per your request for reconsideration, I did review a transcript of the hearing before Judge Bernhardson on August 16, 2011, which included the comments from the Guardian ad Litem. Based upon that transcript, I believe that the matter was dismissed due to the jurisdictional issue. With regard to the interview with your son, the Guardian disclosed to the Court her concerns, which is her role, but ultimately it was the Courts determination on jurisdiction.
Based upon the transcript of the hearing, I will not be conducting a complaint investigation. Thank you
Laurie A. Kusek
Guardian ad Litem Program Manager
Hennepin County District Court
Juvenile Justice Center C-35
590 Park Avenue, L878
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1582
612-348-5017
FAX 612-348-4154
Laurie.Kusek@courts.state.mn.us
“You are responsible for the lawful use of this information. This e-mail and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the individual or organization to which they are addressed. They may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be disseminated. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance upon this e-mail or the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at 612-348-5017. Thank you.”
From: amy h[mailto: Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 10:54 PM To: Kusek, Laurie Subject: RE: Guardian Ad Litem Complaint Sue Olsen
Laurie, Thank you for your reply. I wanted to ask for reconsideration of the complaint review to be opened due to a couple of factors. I had made this complaint and sent it to you twice. I could not find the first email which was sent in September, but the second was made in November and I have the time stamp on the original email. I double checked to make sure it was sent to the correct email address and it was. Even though it was ultimately dismissed for jurisdiction. The court weighed heavily on Mrs. Olsens statemnet that my son Peyton was coached. Also, I brought up the jurisdiction question in court and I personally believe it was overlooked because the guardian Sue Olsen kept making the claim that Peyton was coached. Mrs. Olsen could not have made that opinion within the brief interaction she had with Peyton. Also Sue Olsen spoke with a Guardian Ad Litem in Georgia, Carol Orleck regarding the court hearing for the order of protection here in Minnesota. Mrs. Orleck (the Georgia Guardian Ad Litem) testified under oath in a Georgia court that Sue Olsen told her that I delibertely coached Peyton to claim his father abused him and Mrs. Olsen said it was the worst case of coaching she had ever dealth with. My two older children who witnessed some of the behavior exibihited by my ex-husband were not interviewed and the statements they made were ignored. As a Guardian Ad Litem, I believe Mrs. Olsen’s actions were very hasty and very costly to the safety of my son. I am requesting a reconsideration on the opening an investigation to these actions. Thank you, Amy H Minneapolis, Minnesota
Guardian ad Litem Program Manager Hennepin County District Court Juvenile Justice Center C-35 590 Park Avenue, L878 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1582 612-348-5017 FAX 612-348-4154 Laurie.Kusek@courts.state.mn.us “You are responsible for the lawful use of this information. This e-mail and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the individual or organization to which they are addressed. They may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be disseminated. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance upon this e-mail or the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at 612-348-5017. Thank you.” From: amy h Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 7:04 PM To: Kusek, Laurie Subject: Fw: Guardian Ad Litem Complaint Sue Olsen
|
Kusek, Laurie Ms. s:Â Based upon the transcript itself, the Court indicated that because âthe state of Georgia clearly has jurisdiction hereâ the court indicated that you needed to go the state of Georgia, as there is a pending matter in that state.Â
Ms. H: Based upon the transcript itself, the Court indicated that because “the state of Georgia clearly has jurisdiction here” the court indicated that you needed to go the state of Georgia, as there is a pending matter in that state. Your son did not disclose to the Guardian any abuse by his father, and indicated that he was told to tell whoever would be speaking to him that he was scared to be in Georgia and everyone is slapping him. The Court also indicated that since you did not have any firsthand knowledge or any present knowledge of what was happening in Georgia, the matter needed to be heard in Georgia, and that this Court, in Hennepin County, did not have any jurisdiction. Being that the father has temporary custody of the child in Georgia, and that the father has had no contact with the State of Minnesota where there is a minimum contacts requirement in order to have Mr. Hopkins even served, the Court indicated that this matter needed to go to Georgia. Based on these circumstances, I believe that procedures were correctly followed.
Laurie A. Kusek
Guardian ad Litem Program Manager
Hennepin County District Court
Juvenile Justice Center C-35
590 Park Avenue, L878
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1582
612-348-5017
FAX 612-348-4154
Laurie.Kusek@courts.state.mn.us
“You are responsible for the lawful use of this information. This e-mail and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the individual or organization to which they are addressed. They may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be disseminated. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance upon this e-mail or the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at 612-348-5017. Thank you.”
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 5:50 PM To: Kusek, Laurie Subject: RE: Guardian Ad Litem Complaint Sue Olsen
Mrs Kusek, I disagree with your decision that the court dismissed the case solely due to jurisdiction and not based on the Guardians actions. The guardian Sue Olsen’s comments also affected a case in Georgia. I would like know what agency would handle an appeal of your decision? There are a couple of reasons why and would like to appeal this. |
Kusek, Laurie Ms. H Per your request for reconsideration, I did review a transcript of the hearing before Judge Bernhardson on August 16, 2011, which included the comments from the Guardian ad Litem. Based upon that transcript, I believe that the matter w
Ms. H Per your request for reconsideration, I did review a transcript of the hearing before Judge Bernhardson on August 16, 2011, which included the comments from the Guardian ad Litem. Based upon that transcript, I believe that the matter was dismissed due to the jurisdictional issue. With regard to the interview with your son, the Guardian disclosed to the Court her concerns, which is her role, but ultimately it was the Courts determination on jurisdiction.
Based upon the transcript of the hearing, I will not be conducting a complaint investigation. Thank you
Laurie A. Kusek
Guardian ad Litem Program Manager
Hennepin County District Court
Juvenile Justice Center C-35
590 Park Avenue, L878
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1582
612-348-5017
FAX 612-348-4154
Laurie.Kusek@courts.state.mn.us
“You are responsible for the lawful use of this information. This e-mail and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the individual or organization to which they are addressed. They may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be disseminated. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance upon this e-mail or the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at 612-348-5017. Thank you.”
From: amy [mailto: Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 10:54 PM To: Kusek, Laurie Subject: RE: Guardian Ad Litem Complaint Sue Olsen
Laurie, Thank you for your reply. I wanted to ask for reconsideration of the complaint review to be opened due to a couple of factors. I had made this complaint and sent it to you twice. I could not find the first email which was sent in September, but the second was made in November and I have the time stamp on the original email. I double checked to make sure it was sent to the correct email address and it was. Even though it was ultimately dismissed for jurisdiction. The court weighed heavily on Mrs. Olsens statemnet that my son Peyton was coached. Also, I brought up the jurisdiction question in court and I personally believe it was overlooked because the guardian Sue Olsen kept making the claim that Peyton was coached. Mrs. Olsen could not have made that opinion within the brief interaction she had with Peyton. Also Sue Olsen spoke with a Guardian Ad Litem in Georgia, Carol Orleck regarding the court hearing for the order of protection here in Minnesota. Mrs. Orleck (the Georgia Guardian Ad Litem) testified under oath in a Georgia court that Sue Olsen told her that I delibertely coached Peyton to claim his father abused him and Mrs. Olsen said it was the worst case of coaching she had ever dealth with. My two older children who witnessed some of the behavior exibihited by my ex-husband were not interviewed and the statements they made were ignored. As a Guardian Ad Litem, I believe Mrs. Olsen’s actions were very hasty and very costly to the safety of my son. I am requesting a reconsideration on the opening an investigation to these actions. Thank you, Amy H Minneapolis, Minnesota
Guardian ad Litem Program Manager Hennepin County District Court Juvenile Justice Center C-35 590 Park Avenue, L878 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1582 612-348-5017 FAX 612-348-4154 Laurie.Kusek@courts.state.mn.us “You are responsible for the lawful use of this information. This e-mail and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the individual or organization to which they are addressed. They may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be disseminated. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance upon this e-mail or the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at 612-348-5017. Thank you.” From: amy hSent: Friday, April 20, 2012 7:04 PM To: Kusek, Laurie Subject: Fw: Guardian Ad Litem Complaint Sue Olsen
|
Kusek, Laurie Ms. H:Â Based upon the transcript itself, the Court indicated that because âthe state of Georgia clearly has jurisdiction hereâ the court indicated that you needed to go the state of Georgia, as there is a pending matter in that state.Â
Ms. H Based upon the transcript itself, the Court indicated that because “the state of Georgia clearly has jurisdiction here” the court indicated that you needed to go the state of Georgia, as there is a pending matter in that state. Your son did not disclose to the Guardian any abuse by his father, and indicated that he was told to tell whoever would be speaking to him that he was scared to be in Georgia and everyone is slapping him. The Court also indicated that since you did not have any firsthand knowledge or any present knowledge of what was happening in Georgia, the matter needed to be heard in Georgia, and that this Court, in Hennepin County, did not have any jurisdiction. Being that the father has temporary custody of the child in Georgia, and that the father has had no contact with the State of Minnesota where there is a minimum contacts requirement in order to have Mr. Hopkins even served, the Court indicated that this matter needed to go to Georgia. Based on these circumstances, I believe that procedures were correctly followed.
Laurie A. Kusek
Guardian ad Litem Program Manager
Hennepin County District Court
Juvenile Justice Center C-35
590 Park Avenue, L878
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1582
612-348-5017
FAX 612-348-4154
Laurie.Kusek@courts.state.mn.us
“You are responsible for the lawful use of this information. This e-mail and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the individual or organization to which they are addressed. They may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be disseminated. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance upon this e-mail or the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at 612-348-5017. Thank you.”
From: amy h[mailto:m] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 5:50 PM To: Kusek, Laurie Subject: RE: Guardian Ad Litem Complaint Sue Olsen
Mrs Kusek, I disagree with your decision that the court dismissed the case solely due to jurisdiction and not based on the Guardians actions. The guardian Sue Olsen’s comments also affected a case in Georgia. I would like know what agency would handle an appeal of your decision? There are a couple of reasons why and would like to appeal this. The interstate child custody agreement for every state gives the courts jurisdication to interviene in and assume jurisdiction in a case where a minor is suspected of being abused in another state and the minor is currently in the state where a protective order is filed. I believe it was due to the comments of the Guardian Ad LItem that my case was dismissed. The Guardian Ad Litem did not speak with my son in dept and made a very hasty and detrimential decision which has endangered my son. She did not interview my older children present or any family members present that day. The judge dimissed jurisdiction because the judge did not believe my son was in danger due to the remarks of the Guardian. The Guardian Ad Litem Sue Olsen spoke with a guardian ad litem in Georgia assigned to represent my son in the original custody case in Georgia. Sue Olsen did not tell that guardian Ad Litem that the case was dismissed for jurisdiction but told her I coached my son. This statement was testified to under oath in Georgia by Carol Orleck. Mrs. Orleck also testified under oath that it was Sue Olsen’s opinion that it was the worst case of coaching that she (Sue Olsen) had ever seen. These actions have cause more harm than I can describe and I would like for them to be looked into. I don’t believe that procedures were followed. Thank you, Amy H
Guardian ad Litem Program Manager Hennepin County District Court Juvenile Justice Center C-35 590 Park Avenue, L878 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1582 612-348-5017 FAX 612-348-4154 Laurie.Kusek@courts.state.mn.us “You are responsible for the lawful use of this information. This e-mail and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the individual or organization to which they are addressed. They may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be disseminated. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance upon this e-mail or the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at 612-348-5017. Thank you.” From: amy h[mailto:@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 10:54 PM To: Kusek, Laurie Subject: RE: Guardian Ad Litem Complaint Sue Olsen
|
Me Snippet unavailable
Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!
Ms. s: Based upon the transcript itself, the Court indicated that because “the state of Georgia clearly has jurisdiction here” the court indicated that you needed to go the state of Georgia, as there is a pending matter in that state. Your son did not disclose to the Guardian any abuse by his father, and indicated that he was told to tell whoever would be speaking to him that he was scared to be in Georgia and everyone is slapping him. The Court also indicated that since you did not have any firsthand knowledge or any present knowledge of what was happening in Georgia, the matter needed to be heard in Georgia, and that this Court, in Hennepin County, did not have any jurisdiction. Being that the father has temporary custody of the child in Georgia, and that the father has had no contact with the State of Minnesota where there is a minimum contacts requirement in order to have Mr. Hopkins even served, the Court indicated that this matter needed to go to Georgia. Based on these circumstances, I believe that procedures were correctly followed.
Laurie A. Kusek
Guardian ad Litem Program Manager
Hennepin County District Court
Juvenile Justice Center C-35
590 Park Avenue, L878
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1582
612-348-5017
FAX 612-348-4154
Laurie.Kusek@courts.state.mn.us
“You are responsible for the lawful use of this information. This e-mail and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the individual or organization to which they are addressed. They may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be disseminated. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance upon this e-mail or the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at 612-348-5017. Thank you.”
From: amy [mailto:a@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 5:50 PM To: Kusek, Laurie Subject: RE: Guardian Ad Litem Complaint Sue Olsen
Mrs Kusek, I disagree with your decision that the court dismissed the case solely due to jurisdiction and not based on the Guardians actions. The guardian Sue Olsen’s comments also affected a case in Georgia. I would like know what agency would handle an appeal of your decision? There are a couple of reasons why and would like to appeal this. The interstate child custody agreement for every state gives the courts jurisdication to interviene in and assume jurisdiction in a case where a minor is suspected of being abused in another state and the minor is currently in the state where a protective order is filed. I believe it was due to the comments of the Guardian Ad LItem that my case was dismissed. The Guardian Ad Litem did not speak with my son in dept and made a very hasty and detrimential decision which has endangered my son. She did not interview my older children present or any family members present that day. The judge dimissed jurisdiction because the judge did not believe my son was in danger due to the remarks of the Guardian. The Guardian Ad Litem Sue Olsen spoke with a guardian ad litem in Georgia assigned to represent my son in the original custody case in Georgia. Sue Olsen did not tell that guardian Ad Litem that the case was dismissed for jurisdiction but told her I coached my son. This statement was testified to under oath in Georgia by Carol Orleck. Mrs. Orleck also testified under oath that it was Sue Olsen’s opinion that it was the worst case of coaching that she (Sue Olsen) had ever seen. These actions have cause more harm than I can describe and I would like for them to be looked into. — On Tue, 5/22/12, Kusek, Laurie <Laurie.Kusek@courts.state.mn.us> wrote:
Guardian ad Litem Program Manager Hennepin County District Court Juvenile Justice Center C-35 590 Park Avenue, L878 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1582 612-348-5017 FAX 612-348-4154 Laurie.Kusek@courts.state.mn.us “You are responsible for the lawful use of this information. This e-mail and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the individual or organization to which they are addressed. They may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be disseminated. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance upon this e-mail or the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at 612-348-5017. Thank you.” |